Translate

FACEBLOG

Anti-depressants likely do more harm than good, study suggests

Commonly prescribed anti-depressants appear to be doing patients more harm than good, say researchers who have published a paper examining the impact of the medications on the entire body. See Also: Health & Medicine Pharmacology Birth Defects Mental Health Research Mind & Brain Depression Disorders and Syndromes Psychiatry Reference COX-2 inhibitor Psychoactive drug Seasonal affective disorder Anti-obesity drug "We need to be much more cautious about the widespread use of these drugs," says Paul Andrews, an evolutionary biologist at McMaster University and lead author of the article, published recently in the online journal Frontiers in Psychology. "It's important because millions of people are prescribed anti-depressants each year, and the conventional wisdom about these drugs is that they're safe and effective." Andrews and his colleagues examined previous patient studies into the effects of anti-depressants and determined that the benefits of most anti-depressants, even taken at their best, compare poorly to the risks, which include premature death in elderly patients. Anti-depressants are designed to relieve the symptoms of depression by increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain, where it regulates mood. The vast majority of serotonin that the body produces, though, is used for other purposes, including digestion, forming blood clots at wound sites, reproduction and development. What the researchers found is that anti-depressants have negative health effects on all processes normally regulated by serotonin. The findings include these elevated risks: developmental problems in infants problems with sexual stimulation and function and sperm development in adults digestive problems such as diarrhea, constipation, indigestion and bloating abnormal bleeding and stroke in the elderly The authors reviewed three recent studies showing that elderly anti-depressant users are more likely to die than non-users, even after taking other important variables into account. The higher death rates indicate that the overall effect of these drugs on the body is more harmful than beneficial. "Serotonin is an ancient chemical. It's intimately regulating many different processes, and when you interfere with these things you can expect, from an evolutionary perspective, that it's going to cause some harm," Andrews says. Millions of people are prescribed anti-depressants every year, and while the conclusions may seem surprising, Andrews says much of the evidence has long been apparent and available. "The thing that's been missing in the debates about anti-depressants is an overall assessment of all these negative effects relative to their potential beneficial effects," he says. "Most of this evidence has been out there for years and nobody has been looking at this basic issue." In previous research, Andrews and his colleagues had questioned the effectiveness of anti-depressants even for their prescribed function, finding that patients were more likely to suffer relapse after going off their medications as their brains worked to re-establish equilibrium. With even the intended function of anti-depressants in question, Andrews says it is important to look critically at their continuing use. "It could change the way we think about such major pharmaceutical drugs," he says. "You've got a minimal benefit, a laundry list of negative effects -- some small, some rare and some not so rare. The issue is: does the list of negative effects outweigh the minimal benefit?"

0 comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Video Gallery

TEN NAMES YOU ARE STILL NOT ALLOWED TO BE TOLD...TEN NAMES YOU ARE STILL NOT ALLOWED TO BE TOLD... 1. A rich public figure won a gagging order to hush up his infidelity claiming it would be ‘very distressing’ for his family if details of his affair were made public. 2. A multi-millionaire footballer won a gagging order banning the reporting of allegations of a ‘sexual liaison, encounter or relationship’ with a foreign sportswoman. 3. A top Premier League and international star – a multi-millionaire father in a long-term relationship – took out an injunction that prevented a woman going public with claims that he cheated on his wife. 4. A Premier League manager won an injunction gagging a cuckolded husband from revealing his identity and details of his affair with the man’s wife, claiming he was trying to rebuild his family life. 5. One of the Premier League’s most famous and best-paid players, this married man with children took out an injunction preventing publication of details of a ‘sexual liaison or relationship’ between him and another woman. 6. A married TV star obtained a gagging order stopping his ex-wife writing about their relationship and claims that they had a sexual affair after he remarried. 7. An international footballer playing for one of the Premier League’s biggest clubs won an injunction covering an alleged ‘blackmail plot’ over a group sex incident with three Swedish women at a hotel, filmed on a mobile phone. 8. A world-famous sportsman, not a footballer, who is married and a father was granted an injunction over any suggestions of an ‘extramarital affair’ with another woman. 9. A married TV star and comedian obtained a gagging order preventing the publication of allegations that he engaged in S&M sex and the disclosure of text messages, emails and photos relating to the allegations. 10. A high profile actor alleged to have paid for sex with Helen Wood, a prostitute who also had Wayne Rooney as a client, won a secrecy injunction.